Porr video gratis escorte stockholm


porr video gratis escorte stockholm

Closing an unopposed XfD nomination under this procedure does not require the discussion to have been relisted any particular number of times. Of a redirect or trivial content at the target page name) or merger. A deletion discussion that is poorly formatted should not be closed for this reason alone, in order to avoid biting new users. Nominations which are made solely to provide a forum for disruption (this includes editor harassment ). Merge Articles, categories, templates This combines two separate pages into a single page. However, discussions with minimal participation where no one opposes deletion should be closed per WP:noquorum. Proposed deletion The proposed deletion process applies to articles and files that do not meet the stringent criteria for speedy deletion, but for which it is believed that deletion would be uncontroversial. For the failed proposal, see WP:Soft deletion (failed proposal). Frivolous or vexatious nominations (recently featured articles, for example). It can sometimes be better to allow a few extra days even if current discussion seems very clearly to hold one opinion, to be sure that it really will be a snowball and as a courtesy to be sure that no significant input will. If the nominator appears to have genuinely changed their mind due to other views expressed, the discussion should not be considered withdrawn.

Sexleksaker online svenska amatörer tube

Conflict between the views expressed and Wikipedia's policies and guidelines (e.g., an inappropriate supermajority view without an appropriate basis Remember that you have quite a few options. Move (non-category pages or Rename (categories) All Issues to be addressed by changing the page title (and perhaps then expanding or improving its content). No quorum "WP:Soft Deletion" redirects here. Editors reopening discussions are advised to notify the original closer. Non-administrators closing discussions Further information: Wikipedia:Non-admin closure In general, administrators are responsible for closing deletion discussions, but non-administrators who are registered (i.e. No consensus All A lack of a rough consensus for any one particular action. Closers should review these policies to confirm the criteria are met, and then use their discretion. Subst : afd top 'Keep' per WP:snow. Especially, closers should beware of interpreting "early pile on" as necessarily showing how a discussion will end. The closer should aim in any case, to decide based upon consensus, and policy and community norms. 3 Do not close discussions in which you have offered an opinion, or for a page in which you have a vested interest (i.e.

porr video gratis escorte stockholm

they would a prod rationale. The page log may have information about previous deletions that could warrant salting the page or keeping. In some cases, it would be appropriate to notify the page's creator of the deletion. The nominated page is a policy or guideline. If you wish to merge templates or categories, use the deletion discussions. The deletion process encompasses the processes involved in implementing and recording the community's decisions to delete or keep pages and media. This clause should not be used to close a discussion when a particular outcome is merely "likely" or "highly likely and there is a genuine and reasoned basis for disagreement. Common options include, but are not limited to: relisting the discussion (see the section ' Relisting discussions closing as "no consensus" with no prejudice against speedy renomination ( npasr closing in favour of the nominator's stated proposal; soft deleting the article. Note: Office actions and declarations from the, wikimedia Foundation Board or the system administrators, particularly concerning copyright, legal issues, or server load, may take priority over community consensus. In general, administrators are responsible for closing these discussions, though non-administrators in good standing may close them under specific conditions. Snowball clause The "snowball clause" exists to avoid process for the sake of process, or when the outcome of the deletion discussion is, or has become, almost certain, such that there is not a "snowball's chance in hell" that the outcome will be anything other. The closer should make it clear the deletion is a soft delete as part of the close, ideally with a link to this guideline.


Files in the File : namespace that have a escorttjej gbg knulla i örebro local description page but no local file. There is also proposed deletion, an alternative system to suggest uncontroversial delayed speedy deletion of pages in the article namespace after a notice has been present for seven days. Disambiguate (or "Dabify Articles, redirects If the discussion concludes that the title can refer to many topics, it can be changed to a disambiguation page to list all of them. If the former was the case, politely tell the nominator to properly start a new discussion with the correct title, and the time they start the new discussion will be treated as the nomination time. In some circumstances, a page may be speedily deleted if it meets strict criteria set by consensus. Userfy Articles, templates, miscellaneous pages This would move the page into the creator's userspace so that they may make improvements. The deletion process is not a forum for policy concerns. From search results, modify the query, return to the preview, or not. Non-admins should indicate their non-admin status with the nac non-admin close template, which should always be substituted.g. Not IPs) may close discussions, with the following provisions: Like all discussions, deletion discussions must be decided in accordance with consensus and Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Subst:nac If an administrator has deleted a page (including by speedy deletion) but neglected to close the discussion, anyone may close the discussion provided that the administrator's name and deletion summary are included in the closing rationale. However, under certain circumstances, discussions may be closed prior to the seven-day timeframe. This similarly applies to deletion nominations as well; if no editor suggests that the corresponding article should be kept, then redirection is an option. Never close a discussion as a wrong venue without opening a discussion at an appropriate one. Exception: a non-administrator may close a TfD as orphan. Instead, start a discussion on the talk page of the concerned page or at the village pump. This can sometimes happen when a topic attracts high levels of attention from those engaged (or having a specific view) but slower attention from other less involved editors, perhaps with other points of view. Common outcomes See also: Wikipedia:Guide to deletion Recommendations and outcomes, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes, and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Common outcomes A deletion discussion may end with one of a number of distinct outcomes, with certain outcomes being more common at certain deletion discussion venues. For example, "Merge and delete" or "Rename and merge". If Wikipedia essays are nominated, they will sometimes be moved to userspace if they are found to violate policies or guidelines. Closing discussions that run their full time Discussions are usually closed after seven days (168 hours). Scripts such as User:Evad37/XFDcloser automate the process. Venue inappropriate (e.g., a file hosted on Commons, category or redirect at AFD, or discussions that the chosen venue is unable to address) List the topic at the correct venue, notify the nominator, and close the discussion and provide a link to the new discussion. Reasons for deletion Starting a discussion Speedy process Closing instructions Templates for discussion (TfD) Pages in the Template : and Module : namespaces, excluding stub templates, userboxes, and redirects.


Massage i lund titta på porrfilm

  • Thaimassage i göteborg condomer
  • Sexiga underkläder butik sex movis
  • Sthlm escorts dejtingsajter för unga

Massage frölunda sexiga billiga underkläder

However, editors may propose the deletion of a page if they believe that it would be an uncontroversial candidate for deletion. See this July 2015 discussion. Return and search all three. The time of tagging would then be treated as the nomination time. However, if subsequent editors have added substantive comments in good faith, the nomination should not be speedily closed (though the nominator's opinion will be discounted in the closure decision). To implement a 'no consensus' outcome: close the deletion discussion as 'no consensus edit the page to remove the deletion notice; and record the outcome on the page's talk page using one of several venue-specific templates (see ' Step-by-step instructions ' for details).

porr video gratis escorte stockholm

Sexiga kläder kvinnor stockholm sex tjejer

WhatLinksHere may show that the page is an oft-referred part of the encyclopedia, or may show other similar pages that warrant deletion. If there are clearly none, or the nomination is disruptive, the nomination page should be closed early (see 'speedy close. Use for all rename discussions other than for categories and stub templates (both of which are done at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion ). Normally, a deletion discussion must be held to form a consensus to delete a page. Add the appropriate tag to the article: Pages with many revisions The deletion of pages with long histories may impact server performance. When to use RM Starting a discussion Speedy process Closing instructions The process of starting a discussion is greatly aided by the use of Twinkle, a software package available to any autoconfirmed user. Search all deletion discussions To search for any mention of an existing fullpagename of interest in "all discussion types" listed above, go to the page of interest, and preview this line in any of its wikitext: #lst: WP: Deletion process search links These three search. Deletion requested by subject Deletion discussions concerning biographies of living persons who are relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus to keep, may be closed as 'delete' per the deletion policy and BLP policy (request for. Africa Africa#History ) Deletion discussions needing action before their end date Nomination errors and issues In certain situations, a deletion discussion may require correcting, moving elsewhere, or a null outcome procedural close due to issues with the deletion nomination rather than the merits of the. Consensus Main pages: Wikipedia:Consensus and Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion Consensus is formed through the careful consideration, dissection and eventual synthesis of different perspectives presented during the discussion, and is not calculated solely by number of votes. Closers should apply good judgment before speedily closing a discussion, since often it is best to allow the discussion to continue for the entirety of the seven-day period.